Contributed papers are welcome in all branches of acoustics. The technical program will consist of lecture and poster sessions. Technical sessions will be scheduled Monday through Friday, 19–23 April 2010 for the ASA
meeting and Monday through Wednesday, 19–21 April for NOISE-CON 2010.
ACOUSTICAL OCEANOGRAPHY (AO)
Acoustics in polar environments(Joint with Animal Bioacoustics and Underwater Acoustics)
Auditory attention, learning and memory: From neurons to behavior(Joint with Psychological and Physiological Acoustics)
Required accuracy of absorption, scattering, and diffusion coefficients - NOTE: SESSION TITLE CHANGED
Blast-induced traumatic brain injury: Mechanisms, assessment,therapy, and mitigation(Joint with Animal Bioacoustics, Speech Communication, and Psychological and Physiological Acoustics)
Scattering, propagation, sound fields, and animal bioacoustics in polar environments
Organized by: Jennifer L. Miksis-Olds, David K. Mellinger, Ann E. Bowles
Measurements, modeling and analysis of internal waves and neutrally buoyant intrusions and the consequent impact on acoustic signal behavior in shallow water
Organized by: Dajun J. Tang, David L. Bradley
ANIMAL BIOACOUSTICS (AB)
Recent research findings that shed light on the role of cognition in auditory processing and perception in a variety of animal species
Organized by: Cynthia F. Moss
Studies of the specific and general effects of anthropogenic noise on all aquatic life, from invertebrates to marine mammals
Organized by: Carl R. Schilt
Estimating spatial density of animal populations with passive acoustics
Methods, case studies, and results of passive acoustic estimation of the spatial density of animal populations
Organized by: David K. Mellinger
Incorporating context into acoustic automated detection and classification algorithms(Joint with Noise and Signal Processing in Acoustics)
Role of context on detection and logging and classification of animal calls
Organized by: Aaron M. Thode
Signal processing for subtle and complex animal communications(Joint with Signal Processing in Acoustics)
Opportunity for signal processors to understand the issues with the analysis of animal communications to improve analysis and understanding, with the goal of matching signal processing solution with current animal
bioacoustics research needs
Organized by: Sean K. Lehman, Ann E. Bowles
ARCHITECTURAL ACOUSTICS (AA)
Limitations, available libraries, new measurements, improved data, etc.
Organized by: Peter D'Antonio
Acoustical issues in green buildings that result in low user ratings and performance issues
Organized by: Brandon D. Tinianov, David M. Sykes
Case studies, applications, and integration of architectural acousticsin building information modeling three-dimensional modeling(Joint with Noise and INCE)
Architectural acoustics can have or might be integrated in the evolution of design in building information modeling
Organized by: Norman H. Philipp
"Diamonds in the rough" of "hidden gems"
Spaces that possess outstanding acoustical attributes but are not necessarily known about within the popular scheme of acoustical places
Organized by: Andrew N. Miller
Physical acoustics in Boston Symphony Hall: A guide for the perplexed(Joint with Physical Acoustics)
Physical acoustics, i.e., proximity effects on stage, in concert halls
Organized by: James B. Lee
Primary and secondary school special function spaces(Joint with Noise)
Acoustical issues related to the multipurpose spaces in schools
Organized by: Robert C. Coffeen
Rooms for reproduced sound(Joint with Engineering Acoustics)
Interaction of reproduced sound and architecture in studios, cinemas, home theaters, schools, installations, and more
Organized by: K. Anthony Hoover and Alexander U. Case
Speech intelligibility and privacy(Joint with Speech Communication)
Effects of architecture on speech communication
Organized by: Eric L. Reuter
BIOMEDICAL ULTRASOUND/BIORESPONSE TO VIBRATION (BB)
Exposure to blast waves from improvised explosive devices has given rise to a significant increase in traumatic brain injury (TBI). Treatment of TBI requires a better understanding of the physics and biological mechanisms
of injury, assessments of damage, therapies, and mitigation
Organized by: Steven G. Kargl, William C. Moss, Thomas J. Matula
Linear and nonlinear models of ultrasound propagation in biological tissues such as models of frequency dependent attenuation and acoustic backscatter. Numerical approaches and software packages used to solve these
problems will also be explored
Organized by: Robert J. McGough
Ultrasonic characterization of bone
Theoretical modeling and experimental measurements regarding attenuation, velocity, and scattering properties of cancellous and cortical bone and the use of ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis
Organized by: Keith A. Wear
Ultrasonically activated agents(Joint with Physical Acoustics)
Review of fluid, gas, or other-phase based agents for therapeutic and diagnostic ultrasound. These have evolved to active agents that can be activated with spatial and temporal control
Organized by: Oliver D. Kripfgans
Ultrasound induced cellular bioeffects
Effects of ultrasound on mesoscale biological systems through the action of heating, cavitation, or other processes
Organized by: E. Carr Everbach, Stuart B. Mitchell
Return to Table of Contents
Extended instrument techniques
The acoustics of instruments when played with techniques that expand beyond the traditional repertoire of the instrument
Organized by: Jonas Braasch
Register online or use the downloadable registration form.
An abstract of not more than 200 words is required for each paper, whether invited or contributed. ABSTRACTS LONGER THAN 200 WORDS WILL BE EDITED OR TRUNCATED. Authors have the option to submit abstracts via the World Wide Web or by postal mail. Abstracts must be prepared in accordance with the instructions given for the submission method selected. Note specific instructions below for ASA abstracts and NOISE-CON 2010 abstracts.
Anyone planning to attend the meeting who will require the use of an assistive listening device, is requested to advise the Society in advance of the meeting: Acoustical Society of America, Suite 1NO1, 2 Huntington Quadrangle, Melville, NY 11747-4502, asa@aip.org.
| Category | Preregistration by 26 March | Onsite Registration |
| Acoustical Society or INCE Members | $395 | $455 |
| Acoustical Society or INCE Members One-Day Attendance* | $200 | $260 |
| Nonmembers | $445 | $505 |
| Nonmembers One-Day Attendance* | $225 | $285 |
| Nonmember Invited Speakers One-Day Attendance* | Fee waived | Fee waived |
| Nonmember Invited Speakers (Includes one-year ASA membership upon completion of an application) | $110 | $110 |
| ASA Early Career Associate or Full Members (For ASA members who transferred from ASA student member status in 2008, 2009, or 2010) | $200 | $260 |
| ASA or INCE Student Members (with current ID cards) | Fee waived | $25 |
| Nonmember Students (with current ID cards) | $50 | $60 |
| Nonmember Undergraduate Students (with current ID cards indicating undergraduate status) | Fee waived | $60 |
| Emeritus members of ASA of INCE (Emeritus status pre-approved by ASA or INCE) | $60 | $95 |
| Accompanying Persons
(Registrants who will not participate in the technical sessions) |
$60 | $95 |
Binaural loudness summation for tones and noise. Albert B. Jones, Jr. (Dept. of Psychology,
Northeastern Univ., 1600 Massachusetts Ave., Boston, MA 02115, abj@server.edu) and Irene J.
Knox (Boston Univ., Boston, MA 02115)
The relation between binaural and monaural loudnesswas measured by
magnitude stimation for a 1000-Hz tone and for band-limited white noise.
Four types of stimuli--monaural and binaural tone, monaural and binaural noise--were presented
frontally at eight sound pressure levels (SPL) in mixed randomly selected sequences. Subjects
were instructed to rate the four stimuli according to a single loudness scale. The loudness of the
monaural and binaural tones was found to be a power function of the mean square sound
pressure, with an exponent near 0.5. The loudness of the noise increased more rapidly at low
SPL than loudness of the tone; at high SPL it increased more slowly. The bow shape of the noise
function would be predicted from loudness matches between wide-band and narrow-band
stimuli. A sound perceived binaurally was 1.3 to 1.7 times louder than sound of the same SPL
perceived monaurally. Results of these direct loudness estimations agree almost perfectly with
earlier results [D.E. McGee and I.J. Knox, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 57, 55-62 (1975)] from another
group of subjects who made loudness matches between binaural and monaural stimuli. [Work
supported by NSF.]
Number of words in abstract: 187
Suggested for special session on Loudness and Perception
Technical Area: Psychological and Physiological Acoustics
Special facility: VCR and 25" color monitor
PACS Subject Classification number(s): 43.66.Cb
Method of presentation: Prefer lecture but willing to give as poster
Ethical Principles: "I certify that I have complied with ASA Ethical Principles"
Telephone Number: 516-576-2360 (I. J. Knox)
FAX: 516-576-2377
Send notice to: I. J. Knox
Email: ijk@server.com
I have complied with ASA Ethical Principles
Mardi C. Hastings - General Chair
Juan I. Arvelo, Jr. - Technical Program Chair
Arthur N. Popper - Special Events
Catherine H. Frazier - Technical Tours
Michael L. Lucas - General Chair
Courtney B. Burroughs - Technical Program Chair
Richard J. Peppin - Exibition Manager
Return to Table Contents